Thursday, 20 March 2014

For target tracking applications, wireless sensor nodes provide accurate information since they can be deployed and operated near the phenomenon. These sensing devices have the opportunity of collaboration among themselves to improve the target localization and tracking accuracies. An energy-efficient collaborative target tracking paradigm is developed for wireless sensor networks (WSNs). In addition, a novel approach to energy savings in
WSNs is devised in the information-controlled transmission power (ICTP) adjustment, where nodes with more information use higher transmission powers than those that are less informative to share their target state information with the neighboring nod
MODULES
:1. Networking Module.
2. Sensor selection module.
3. ICTP Module.
4. Target tracking Module.
5. Average energy consumed module
Hardware Requirment
REQUIREMENTS:
  • System : Pentium IV 2.4 GHz.
  • Hard Disk : 40 GB.
  • Floppy Drive : 1.44 Mb.
  • Monitor : 15 VGA Colour.
  • Mouse : Logitech.
  • Ram : 256 Mb
Software requirements:
  • Operating system : - Windows XP Professional.
  • Front End : - Asp .Net 2.0.
  • Coding Language : - Visual C# .Net.












Awirelesssensornetwork(WSN)
ofspatiallydistributed autonomous sensors to monitor physical o r environmental conditions, such as temperature, sound, pressure, etc. and to cooperatively pass their data through the network to a main location. The more modern networks are bi-directional, also enabling control of sensor activity. The development of wireless sensor networks was motivated by military applications such as battlefield surveillance; today such networks are used in many industrial and consumer applications, such as industrial process monitoring and control, machine health monitoring, and so on.
·         The WSN is built of "nodes" – from a few to several hundreds or even thousands, where each node is connected to one (or sometimes several) sensors. Each such sensor network node has typically several parts: a radio transceiver with an internal antenna or connection to an external antenna, a microcontroller, an electronic circuit for interfacing with the sensors and an energy source, usually a battery or an embedded form of energy harvesting. A sensor node might vary in size from that of a shoebox down to the size of a grain of dust, although functioning "motes" of genuine microscopic dimensions have yet to be created. The cost of sensor nodes is similarly variable, ranging from a few to hundreds of dollars, depending on the complexity of the individual sensor nodes. Size and cost constraints on sensor nodes result in corresponding constraints on resources such as energy, memory, computational speed and communications bandwidth. The topology of the WSNs can vary from a simple star network to an advanced multi-hop wireless mesh network. The propagation technique between the hops of the network can be routing or flooding.[1][2]
·         In computer science and telecommunications, wireless sensor networks are an active research area with numerous workshops and conferences arranged each year.[3]
·         Area monitorin
A  
area monitoring is a common application of WSNs. In area monitoring, the WSN is deployed over a region where some phenomenon is to be monitored. A military example is the use of sensors detect enemy intrusion; a civilian example is the geo-fencing of gas or oil pipelines. Area monitoring is most important part.
·         Health care monitoring
·         The medical applications can be of two types: wearable and implanted. Wearable devices are used on the body surface of a human or just at close proximity of the user. The implantable medical devices are those that are inserted inside human body. There are many other applications too e.g. body position measurement and location of the person, overall monitoring of ill patients in hospitals and at homes. Body-area networks can collect information about an individual's health, fitness, and energy expenditure.[4]
·         Air pollution monitoring
·         Wireless sensor networks have been deployed in several cities (Stockholm, London and Brisbane) to monitor the concentration of dangerous gases for citizens. These can take advantage of the ad hoc wireless links rather than wired installations, which also make them more mobile for testing readings in different areas.
·         Forest fire detection
·         A network of Sensor Nodes can be installed in a forest to detect when a fire has started. The nodes can be equipped with sensors to measure temperature, humidity and gases which are produced by fire in the trees or vegetation. The early detection is crucial for a successful action of the firefighters; thanks to Wireless Sensor Networks, the fire brigade will be able to know when a fire is started and how it is spreading.
·         Landslide detection
·         A landslide detection system makes use of a wireless sensor network to detect the slight movements of soil and changes in various parameters that may occur before or during a landslide. Through the data gathered it may be possible to know the occurrence of landslides long before it actually happens.
·         Water quality monitoring
·         Water quality monitoring involves analyzing water properties in dams, rivers, lakes & oceans, as well as underground water reserves. The use of many wireless distributed sensors enables the creation of a more accurate map of the water status, and allows the permanent deployment of monitoring stations in locations of difficult access, without the need of manual data retrieval.
·         Natural disaster prevention
·         Wireless sensor networks can effectively act to prevent the consequences of natural disasters, like floods. Wireless nodes have successfully been deployed in rivers where changes of the water levels have to be monitored in real time.
The main characteristics of a WSN include:
·         Power consumption constraints for nodes using batteries or energy harvesting
·         Ability to cope with node failures
·         Mobility of nodes
·         Communication failures
·         Heterogeneity of nodes
·         Scalability to large scale of deployment
·         Ability to withstand harsh environmental conditions
·         Ease of use
Sensor nodes can be imagined as small computers, extremely basic in terms of their interfaces and their components. They usually consist of a processing unit with limited computational power and limited memory, sensors or MEMS (including specific conditioning circuitry), a communication device (usually radio transceivers or alternatively optical), and a power source usually in the form of a battery. Other possible inclusions are energy harvesting modules,[7] secondary ASICs, and possibly secondary communication interface (e.g. RS-232 or USB).
The base stations are one or more components of the WSN with much more computational, energy and communication resources. They act as a gateway between sensor nodes and the end user as they typically forward data from the WSN on to a server. Other special components in routing based networks are routers, designed to compute, calculate and distribute the routing tables.

Hardware


One major challenge in a WSN is to produce low cost and tiny sensor nodes. There are an increasing number of small companies producing WSN hardware and the commercial situation can be compared to home computing in the 1970s. Many of the nodes are still in the research and development stage, particularly their software. Also inherent to sensor network adoption is the use of very low power methods for data acquisition.
In many applications, a WSN communicates with a Local Area Network or Wide Area Network through a gateway. The Gateway acts as a bridge between the WSN and the other network. This enables data to be stored and processed by device with more resources, for example, in a remotely located server.
Energy is the scarcest resource of WSN nodes, and it determines the lifetime of WSNs. WSNs are meant to be deployed in large numbers in various environments, including remote and hostile regions, where ad hoc communications are a key component. For this reason, algorithms and protocols need to address the following issues:
·         Lifetime maximization
·         Robustness and fault tolerance
·         Self-configuration
Lifetime maximization: Energy/Power Consumption of the sensing device should be minimized and sensor nodes should be energy efficient since their limited energy resource determines their lifetime. To conserve power the node should shut off the radio power supply when not in use.
Some of the important topics in WSN(Wireless Sensor Networks) software research are:
·         Operating systems
·         Security
·         Mobility

Operating systems

Operating systems for wireless sensor network nodes are typically less complex than general-purpose operating systems. They more strongly resemble embedded systems, for two reasons. First, wireless sensor networks are typically deployed with a particular application in mind, rather than as a general platform. Second, a need for low costs and low power leads most wireless sensor nodes to have low-power microcontrollers ensuring that mechanisms such as virtual memory are either unnecessary or too expensive to implement.
It is therefore possible to use embedded operating systems such as eCos or uC/OS for sensor networks. However, such operating systems are often designed with real-time properties.
TinyOS is perhaps the first[8] operating system specifically designed for wireless sensor networks. TinyOS is based on an event-driven programming model instead of multithreading. TinyOS programs are composed of event handlers and tasks with run-to-completion semantics. When an external event occurs, such as an incoming data packet or a sensor reading, TinyOS signals the appropriate event handler to handle the event. Event handlers can post tasks that are scheduled by the TinyOS kernel some time later.
LiteOS is a newly developed OS for wireless sensor networks, which provides UNIX-like abstraction and support for the C programming language.
Contiki is an OS which uses a simpler programming style in C while providing advances such as 6LoWPAN and Protothreads.
RIOT implements a microkernel architecture. It provides multithreading with standard API and allows for development in C/C++. RIOT supports common IoT protocols such as 6LoWPAN, IPv6,RPL, TCP, and UDP.[9]
ERIKA Enterprise is an open-source and royalty-free OSEK/VDX Kernel offering BCC1, BCC2, ECC1, ECC2, multicore, memory protection and kernel fixed priority adopting C programming language.

1.      Jump up^ Dargie, W. and Poellabauer, C., "Fundamentals of wireless sensor networks: theory and practice", John Wiley and Sons, 2010 ISBN 978-0-470-99765-9, pp. 168–183, 191–192
2.      Jump up^ Sohraby, K., Minoli, D., Znati, T. "Wireless sensor networks: technology, protocols, and applications, John Wiley and Sons", 2007 ISBN 978-0-471-74300-2, pp. 203–209
3.      Jump up^ http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpls/abs_all.jsp?arnumber=6550437
4.      Jump up^ Peiris, V. (2013). "Highly integrated wireless sensing for body area network applications". SPIE Newsroom. doi:10.1117/2.1201312.005120. edit
5.      Jump up^ Spie (2013). "Vassili Karanassios: Energy scavenging to power remote sensors". SPIE Newsroom. doi:10.1117/2.3201305.05. edit
6.      Jump up^ Tiwari, Ankit et. al, Energy-efficient wireless sensor network design and implementation for condition-based maintenance, ACM Transactions on Sensor Networks (TOSN),http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1210670
7.      Jump up^ Magno, M.; Boyle, D.; Brunelli, D.; O'Flynn, B.; Popovici, E.; Benini, L. (2014). "Extended Wireless Monitoring Through Intelligent Hybrid Energy Supply". IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics 61(4): 1871. doi:10.1109/TIE.2013.2267694. edit
8.      Jump up^ TinyOS Programming, Philip Levis, Cambridge University Press, 2009
9.      Jump up^ Oliver Hahm, Emmanuel Baccelli, Mesut Günes, Matthias Wählisch, Thomas C. Schmidt, RIOT OS: Towards an OS for the Internet of Things, In: Proc. of the 32nd IEEE INFOCOM. Poster Session, Piscataway, NJ, USA:IEEE Press, 2013.
10.  Jump up^ Silva, D.; Ghanem, M.; Guo, Y. (2012). "WikiSensing: An Online Collaborative Approach for Sensor Data Management". Sensors 12 (12): 13295. doi:10.3390/s121013295. edit
11.  Jump up^ Muaz Niazi, Amir Hussain (2011). A Novel Agent-Based Simulation Framework for Sensing in Complex Adaptive Environments. IEEE Sensors Journal, Vol.11 No. 2, 404–412. Pap

Student projects


We are always looking for highly motivated students that are interested in working with us on our research projects. We have a number of Bachelor (B) and Master's (M) thesis available. The topics of available theses are related to the fields of wireless sensor networks, mobile sensing, cyber-physical systems, and similar areas.
If you are interested in learning about available topics, please contact us.
Templates for project reports and presentations are available here.

Ongoing projects

Type
Title
Student
Supervisor
Submission
M
Breaking Down the Demographics: How Our Demographic Data Influences Our Mobility Behavior
Herrero Domínguez, Christian
May, 2014

Completed projects

Type
Title
Student
Supervisor
Submission
B
Monitoring Mechanisms for Wireless Sensor Networks
Yan, Qingli
Sep, 2012
B
Evaluation of Event-management Systems based on Actual Data Platforms at the Railway Operating Field Darmstadt
Stroeher, Niels
Jun, 2012
B
A Survey of State-of-the-art Prediction Algorithms and Models for Human Mobility
Kruk, Sabina
May, 2013
B
Proton: Protocol-independent Monitoring of Mobile Ad Hoc Networks
Richerzhagen, Nils
Jan, 2013
S
Efficient and Standard-compliant Integration of Sensor Networks and the ROS Robot Operating System
El Mahjoub, Brahim
Silvia Santini
Philipp Scholl
M
Automatic Classification of Private Households Using Electricity Consumption Data
Sadamori, Leyna
Nov, 2012
M
MONET: A Component-based Framework for Efficient Active Monitoring in Wireless Sensor Networks
Ullrich, Thomas
May, 2013
M
Design and Development of a Forest of Wireless Sensor Network Testbeds
Gurov, Iliya
Silvia Santini
Pablo Guerrero
Jan, 2013
M
Lissome Development of Variable Software Features for Mobile Business Applications
Kolokolov, Viktor
Paul Baumann
Stefan Ruehl
Jun, 2013



Above data is collected and shared from various sources available on websites and in general article sections like newspaper, magazines etc .data might not be 100% correct. Request all the users to re verify if again. Web world group India
                                                                                                                Data taken on dated

                                                                                                                21/03/2014